October 2022

October 22, 2022, was on everyone’s lips in Wildwood earlier in the month. As The Race of Gentlemen wasn’t unfolding, folks with hopped-up Model As and other sorts of traditional hot rods (that is, the kind that look like they did in the ‘50s and before) were looking for one more place to go fast before weather brought the driving season to a near-complete halt. For those who lived in or near New England, Campton, New Hampshire, was that place.

Held on private land and advertised almost exclusively by word of mouth, the Jalopy Hill Climb started in 2021 more or less on a whim, when Alan Johnston decided to try and get his ’39 Ford pickup to the top of his brother’s mountain/sand-and-gravel pit, which happens to include a steep dirt road and spectacular views of the White Mountains. The flathead-powered ’39 made it and spawned the idea of inviting other cool old (pre-’62) cars to attempt the feat themselves.

There are no clocks and it’s not side-by-side racing, but it’s enough of a challenge to make for a very satisfying accomplishment once you get to the top. Plus, once you’re there, you get to circulate among awesome cars and cool people, while watching other participants roll in. Folks who came without cars could get to the top via an Army-surplus 6×6 truck that periodically went up and down.

Everyone wants their hot rod to be low, but roads like these along with steep inclines gave an advantage to the earlier-style cars with better ground clearance and more cart-like suspension. It looked like a blast, and I’m determined to go back with something from the Hemmings fleet to attempt the mountain itself!

To build his 1939 Ford pickup, which was the first “jalopy” to climb the hill and the impetus for the whole event, Alan Johnston started with a 1935 Ford frame and a 1942 Ford cab. The truck did double-duty as the event sign, too.

When this 1931 Ford roadster was hot rodded in 1951, it received a 331-cu.in. Cadillac V-8 for power—quite the high-end touch in those days.

This Model T roadster is the handbuilt creation of talented panel-beater Steve Pugner, who took his first shaping class under Gene Winfield at the tender age of 17.

Rob Hanser’s 1930 Ford Model A/V-8 coupe was built with a self-imposed rule of no-post-1950 parts, for a true period experience.

Word was that this Ford Model A pickup truck had been converted to tractor duty by means of a commercial “Doodlebug” kit, back when it was just a used-up old Ford. The Jalopy Hill Climb was a good place to stretch its legs.

Okay, so the hill wasn’t that steep or slippery. Driving a 1950s-vintage Jeep CJ-3B up the hill almost seemed like cheating, what with the tall stance and 4×4 drivetrain.

Bill, Leah, and Axel Neergaard almost never stopped moving, as young Axel was a huge fan of racing Dad’s 1930 Ford Model A roadster up the hill. The A/V-8 was originally assembled over six days and has another two days invested in post-shakedown revisions.

Lisa English’s 1929 Ford roadster with its distinctive 1935 Ford pickup grille is another veteran of The Race of Gentlemen. It looks good from every angle and sounds equally great.

Shaina “Mrs. Pugs” Pugner is Steve’s wife, and he built the body for her Model A speedster himself as an engagement gift. She’s had it at TROG, on the roads, and now up the mountain—mechanical brakes and all.

It doesn’t take much to put together a proper period hot rod and start having fun. This fenderless ’30-’31 Ford roadster with a V-8 engine was on loan to the driver, and she never seemed to stop smiling while wheeling it up and down the hill.

Gabby Goodwin’s 1929 Ford roadster is deceptively simple. The dropped-and-chopped Model A still features four-cylinder power, but with some mild hop ups. She says the gow is a sweet and satisfying machine to drive.

The legend “MERCURY 255CI” on the hood lets the world know that this 1934 Ford cabriolet (long ago relieved of its door windows and folding top) has the vaunted four-inch-stroke crankshaft in its flathead V-8.

Alden and Isaac English are the sons of Lisa and Eric English. The whole English family is well-known throughout the northeast for Eli’s shop, Traditional Speed & Kustom. The teenaged boys built this pickup, the Home School Hot Rod, entirely by themselves with only guidance from Dad.

A V-8 was still a year in the future when this 1954 Plymouth convertible was built, but the six-cylinder flathead proved up to the task of motorvating a full load of passengers to the top of the mountain.

“Exuberant” is the only way to describe the way this ’32 Ford five-window coupe went up and down the hill. You could tell the driver was trying to wring every bit of speed out on each run.

This butter-yellow Model A coupe with later wheels and headlamps looked a lot like well-kept, inexpensive transportation, circa the late 1940s. It ate up the hill climb like it was a drive in the country—probably because a lot more roads looked like this back then.

Combining the cowl and windshield of a slant-window Fordor sedan with a set of coupe quarters permitted the creation of a rather convincing 1931 Ford Model A three-window coupe, a styling idea Ford toyed with but never produced.

Who says four-door sedans can’t be cool? This 1934 Ford, built in an early ‘60s style, looked every bit as impressive as its two-door equivalent might have and in some ways it was better. Imagine rolling up with in this filled with friends.

Although it looks like a survivor from the 1950s, this is actually a fiberglass-bodied car built on a budget and with a lot of ingenuity and an eye for period detail. Power comes from a 283-cu.in. Chevrolet small-block V-8 backed up by a Camaro T-5 transmission using a custom shifter echoing an old Hurst Indy unit.

Hill climbs were a bit old fashioned by the time the mid-‘60s rolled around, so this ’34 Ford coupe done in that era’s style seemed foreign on the dirt road, but nevertheless performed admirably.

Brian Lundgren is a high-school history teacher by day, and in his leisure time he’s built this Model A coupe in a way that makes it look straight out of the postwar ‘40s.

Even customs got into the act, like this taildragging ’50 Ford with fender skirts.

Technically the Jalopy Hill Climb is for 1962-and-earlier cars, but this ’66 Pontiac Tempest slipped in and nobody was complaining about it.

Leaving the splash aprons on yet removing the fenders and running boards was commonly done to Ford Model A’s like this in the era right around World War II. Properly removing the aprons involved lifting the body off the frame—not something everyone wanted to tackle back then.

Bob Berggren brought his Model T pickup gow job to last year’s Hill Climb, then went home and built this Model T speedster from a discarded 1926 coupe chassis, some century-old barn wood, and a lot of things he already had laying around.

Ghosted Mobilgas Flying Red Horse signs on the doors hint at this Model A roadster’s past as a service-station support vehicle.

Although it looks like a refugee from the ‘50s, this 1929 Ford roadster was actually constructed by owner Ron Wheeler from parts. The flathead V-8-powered car is another TROG veteran out looking for more of that type of fun.

The U.S. Army didn’t keep many of the 45-cu.in. Harley-Davidson WLA “Liberator” motorcycles constructed for World War II. The surplus bikes hit the civilian market, and many became bobbers like Alan Raymond’s.

An entire contingent of essentially stock Model A’s showed up at some point and reminded everyone that all that was required for them to get up the hill was second gear. They weren’t the fastest, but they didn’t struggle, either.

Denis Finnerty of Finn’s Garage has this Whippet-nosed 1930 Ford speedster for sale in the Hemmings Classifieds [https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/dealer/ford/model-a/2606360.html]. It sports a 223-cu.in. Ford six-cylinder and a Mustang five-speed, plus a rarely seen parallel-leaf-spring chassis.

For those without a vintage car to pilot up the mountain, period ferry trips via Army-surplus 6×6 took folks to the top and back.

Date: circa 1980s

Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Source: via Cincinnati State Archives

What do you see here?

From its inception more than 130 years ago, France’s automotive industry has stood apart from all others. Sometimes it set precedents that all others followed, like establishing the front-engine/transmission/rear-wheel-drive layout (“Le Système Panhard“) circa 1892. Other times, it stood alone with unique requirements that no other country with an automotive industry has adopted. France’s vehicular use of selective yellow forward lighting between 1937 and 1992 was a key example of the latter, and the reason for it might seem as murky as the darkness it was designed to penetrate.

In the first couple decades of global automotive production, forward-facing road illumination was largely the same around the world: kerosene-fueled oil lamps (more useful as signals to others than actually lighting the path of travel) were followed by those lit using acetylene gas, and both were ultimately replaced by electric-powered light bulbs. As headlamps grew more powerful, regulations were introduced that mandated how much light could be thrown and where in an attempt to limit glare for oncoming traffic.

What was wrong with regular lights?

The ongoing development of lighting output and beam patterns soon began to differ between American and European automakers, as David W. Moore discussed in his June 1998 thesis for The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, titled Headlamp History and Harmonization:

The early developments regarding vehicle headlamps were similar for the U.S. and Europe. Bulbs, lighting components, and beam patterns were essentially the same (Devaux, 1970; Meese, 1972; Maurer, 1980). However, in the 1920s two different approaches to automotive lighting began to appear. Much of this can be attributed to the more rapid increase in the vehicle population in the U.S. than in Europe. There were also differences in the use of the automobile. Americans more quickly adapted to mobility provided by the automobile, cities expanded, people began moving to the suburbs, and industry developed outside of the center of the downtown area. Americans drove their cars more on the open roads and did more night driving. Europeans retained more of the focus on the center city area and daytime driving. It is generally acknowledged that these factors contributed to the two different approaches (Nelson, 1954; deBoer, 1955; Meese, 1972; Olson, 1977). The two approaches can be summarized as follows:

(1) Primary emphasis: Develop as much light as possible to maximize seeing ahead of the vehicle. Secondary emphasis: Consider the other driver and try to do something to minimize glare. (U.S. philosophy)

(2) Primary emphasis: Do whatever is necessary to minimize glare in the other driver’s eyes. Secondary emphasis: Try to make sure there is available light to drive. (European philosophy)

When did France mandate yellow headlamps?

By the mid-1930s, automotive headlamp performance had stabilized and advanced to the point that French legislators were moved to create a law that favored oncoming traffic over the vehicle operator. According to some sources, this decree was made in early November 1936, and it made yellow headlamps mandatory on new cars beginning April 1937; all roadgoing vehicles would need to be retrofitted with the new lighting by January 1939.

Moore explained this further in his paper:

In 1937 France legislated that headlamps emit (selective) yellow light (Jehu, 1954; Nelson, 1954). The French gave the following reasons for requiring yellow light: improvements in visibility under conditions of glare, and, even more important, reductions in fatigue under glare conditions. The yellow headlamp color was obtained by several different methods: a glass bulb with a different chemical composition, coatings on the glass bulb, a yellow headlamp lens, or a yellow filter. Because the yellow glass for bulbs reduced the emitted light intensity by about 18% (Jehu, 1954), this may have contributed to the perception of reduced glare from yellow headlamps. Many tests were run in different countries which failed to show any significant advantage in favor of yellow headlamps (Schreuder, 1976). However, within France, the mandatory use of yellow headlamps continued until the early 1990s.

What is selective yellow light?

The Daniel Stern Lighting website provides a clear explanation of what selective yellow light is, and why France mandated it: “By removing (filtering) the blue, indigo, and violet out of white light, we get selective yellow light.”

Stern goes on to explain the reason for this adoption: “This legislation was based on advice from the French Central Commission for Automobiles and Traffic, which in turn was based on experiments done by the French Academy of Sciences, concluding that selective yellow light is less glaring than white.”

The method by which this light was achieved varied depending on the prevailing technology of the day: Colored bulbs behind clear glass lenses gave way to halogen bulbs wearing yellow sleeves. An alternative was using a clear halogen bulb behind a Cadmium yellow glass lens. Motoring tourists visiting France from other countries in this period would cover their white headlamps with yellow filters or even paint the lenses yellow, lest they raise the ire of French road users and authorities.

What about the wartime theory?

Various sources posit this regulation was engineered to make native French civilian cars readily identifiable at night out of military concerns. Keeping in mind that it went into effect well before the outbreak of World War II, and that during the conflict automotive lighting was typically restricted at night to make vehicles less visible (and less of potential targets) to enemy aircraft, this seems a bit of a stretch.

When and why did France change its lighting law?

France maintained its yellow lighting requirement until the beginning of 1993, when it changed to “white” lighting in agreement with other European national vehicle regulation standards. It seems that, like those glare-reducing night-driving glasses you see advertised on TV, the benefits of selective yellow headlamps no longer outweighed the drawbacks.

As Valeo Lighting spokesperson Francois Paillusseau explained in this 1990 Top Gear clip, “A recent survey told us more than 50 percent of the French people are ready to go to white.”

In a reversal of what happened in January 1939, cars already using yellow headlamps were permitted to retain them, although new one cars built from that point on had to feature white headlamps; new auxiliary fog lamps were legally allowed to remain yellow.

The car had to stop right that instant. On the way back from an afternoon of pumpkin picking, I spied something unexpected, something that should not have made me as giddy as it did, something that required fuller examination than a quick glimpse out the window at 45 miles-per-hour would have offered. Most people wouldn’t have given a second thought to a Jeep FC-150 in multiple hues of paint and rust, sitting on four flats, seen in passing on the back row of a used car lot. Me, I had to act like I’d just seen Sasquatch handing out $100 bills and cake.

Getting up close to the FC-150, I found exactly what I’d expected to find: a truck that looked like it just got pulled from somebody’s woods where it spent the last 40 years after being worked to death as a plow truck for the prior 20. Likely it sat in the way of a logger harvesting in the nearby forests. It had the smell of old upholstery that had molded and mildewed then been forgotten even by the mold and mildew. If it rolled on its four wheels it would have been a miracle, and I’m certain not a single nut or bolt on it would have come loose without using every blue word and a torch. Probably the only salvageable things left on it were the Jeep Forward Control badges behind each door. I did not offer to buy it, largely because it was a Sunday afternoon and nobody was around for me to offer to buy it from.

Photo by Daniel Strohl

I walked back to the car not exactly disappointed, but wondering what it is about rusty heaps that puts such a spell over people like me and the guy who rescued it and the dozen of you readers who want to know exactly where I spotted it so you can try to buy it off the guy. I should know better—y’all begging me for that location should know better—after a lifetime of having rust flakes bigger than Corn Flakes fall in our eyes, of spending more time loosening bolts than there are daylight hours, and of all the various setbacks that come with trying to coax a little more life out of cars and trucks most other people would consider too far gone.

This isn’t just another lamentation about living in a part of the world where cars are prone to rust. Even the largely rust-free 1993 Silverado I recently bought fought me every step of the way when I removed the plow, thanks to a combination of 30 years of semi-neglect, the galaxy-brain engineers at Fisher who decided every bolt needed to be paired with an inaccessible nut, and the tire shop employee who didn’t bother reading the installation instructions and just winged it with whatever bent and raggedy old tetanus-infused scrap metal he had on hand.

Now plowless, the Silverado drives much nicerPhoto by Daniel Strohl

Yes, I’d be miles ahead if I just stopped bothering with anything showing a speck of rust and instead started out with projects from warmer and drier climates. Or I could just join the rest of the consumer legions and take out wallet-draining loans on new cars that I just trade in every three to six years on an even more costly new car. If I didn’t have to go 10 rounds with everything I own, I’d either have way more builds under my belt or way more free time on my weekends. I’d feel infinitely more accomplished. But that’s not in my—in our—nature.

Part of it likely has to do with economics; a Rockefeller I ain’t. Part of it has to do with growing up in a Rust Belt state where we knew nothing beyond beaters with heaters. But then there’s also the sense of accomplishment when I finally get that bolt unstuck or when I replace the boogered-up repairs with the right parts. After a long afternoon of struggle, I can yell at that rusty heap one more time to finally say that I won, I beat it, and that I can overcome even the most belligerent pile of junk using the logic, patience, and tools earned from a lifetime of wrasslin’ with other clunkers one step away from the scrapyard.

At least, I can until I have to slam on the brakes at the sight of the next rotbox.

That said, what attracts you to cars and trucks that no Californian would touch with a 10-foot pole? And, to provide inspiration to all the rest of us perpetually smelling of PB Blaster, share your recent victories over your rusty, crusty, and frustrating project cars.

Outside of some 1950s microcars and a certain rounded two-door with an air-cooled engine that sold 21,529,464 examples over the course of 65 years, German automobiles have not typically been known for their affordability. Thankfully, the passage of time tends to temper that trait, and some vehicles that were once out of reach of many enthusiasts can now be purchased for a small fraction of their original prices. We’ve rounded up a selection of classics and modern-classics that we feel represent surprisingly good value in today’s hot market. You may find an example or two of these on the various marque pages in the pages of Hemmings Motor News, along with suppliers of parts and services to bring them up to snuff or keep them in fine roadworthy condition. If you’re ready to enjoy the understated style, quality, and precise road manners that vintage German engineering offers, read on, and then peruse the Hemmings’ classifieds.

1995-’99 BMW 318ti

What to Pay: $1,400-$3,800

BMW’s last attempt at marketing a true entry-level, sub-$20,000 model in the U.S. came with the 1990s E36-generation of 3-series and its funky 318ti. This compact two-door channeled the spirit of the rare and stylish 2002 Touring with its hatchback body style and 138- hp twin-cam four-cylinder engine. Status-conscious Americans didn’t warm to this offbeat BMW even though it promised athletic rear-wheel-drive handling acumen in a segment dominated by front-drivers like VW’s Golf GTI. Special ti variants included the big-sunroof California Edition and M-fettled Club Sport, and they are the cars that tended to attract enthusiast owners who maintained them. While price guides peg 318ti’s as sub-$5,000 cars, classic.com suggests they’re gaining value with an average of $9,076; out of 19 North American auction sales between 2017 and 2022, eight broke the $10,000 barrier. Even still, a 318ti is a bargain since its likes will never be built again.

1976-’82 Porsche 924

What to Pay: $8,550-$23,000

It’s been dismissed and disparaged for decades, but the basic 924 has always represented a finely balanced, surprisingly practical, fun-to-drive-a-slow-car-fast type of sports car. A Volkswagen project that was designed, engineered, and ultimately marketed by Porsche, the water-cooled, inline-four/transaxle-driveline 924 2+2 hatchback coupe would be developed into a no-excuses performance machine as the 931 Turbo, the 944-powered 924S, and the subsequent 944 and 968 models. The original 2.0-liter, 95 to 115-horsepower 924 is both an approachable entry point into the marque and a great tool that keen drivers can enjoy modifying and use to improve their car-control skills. You’ll find 924 cars, parts suppliers, and specialist firms in Hemmings’ pages. It likely won’t appreciate much, but compared to a 911, the 924 is cheap to maintain and improve, and as the least expensive Porsche on the market, it offers a lot of bang for the buck.

1985-’93 Volkswagen Cabriolet

What to Pay: $1,650-$4,025

The specialists at Karmann had decades of experience hand-building Volkswagen’s low-volume convertible versions of the Type 1 Sedan and its front-drive successor, the Golf/Rabbit. VW’s second-generation soft-top shared crisp Giugiaro styling with the solid-roof variants but added the iconic reinforcing roll hoop and snug, triple-layer folding roof. While it entered our market in 1980 as the Rabbit Convertible, this model got a notable upgrade in 1985 when it was renamed Cabriolet and fitted with the Mark 1 GTI’s sprightly 90-hp 1.8-liter engine. VW’s 1988 facelift gave it modern monochromatic styling; multiple special editions drove showroom traffic. It’s believed more than 90,000 Cabriolets were sold here, and surviving examples are reasonably priced, although the best can command upwards of $10,000. Fans love fitting Cabriolets with performance upgrades to enhance their delightful dynamics while retaining their classic 1980s style.

2005- ’11 Mercedes-Benz SLK 55 AMG

What to Pay: $20,000-$25,000

Kicking yourself for not buying the 1955 Mercedes-Benz 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupé that RM Sotheby’s sold for $135 million Euro ($134 million U.S. dollars) back in May at the Mercedes-Benz Museum in Stuttgart? Same here. Luckily, there are other fast, sporty Mercedes-Benzes available out there for a little less than the cost of a private island and a lightly used Gulfstream to fly you there. Take the under-the radar SLK 55 AMG, for instance. This unassuming, compact roadster boasted a lot of outsized features: a retracting “vario-roof” hardtop, a 355-hp 5.4-liter V-8 paired with a seven-speed AMG Speedshift automatic transmission, 18-inch AMG wheels, AMG sport suspension, disc brakes with six-piston calipers, AMG-tuned exhaust with four outlets, and more. It also boasted outsized performance: 4.3 seconds to 60 mph and a 12.7-second quarter mile when Car and Driver tested one back in 2005. The SLK 55 AMG was also the first Mercedes-Benz to receive the Black Series treatment, which raised horsepower to 400, lowered the car’s weight by 99 pounds, and shaved about a half-second off its 0 to 60 mph time. Only 100 were built, but the car wasn’t officially available in the U.S. SLK 55 AMGs stickered north of $60,000 when new, but today they can be found for $30,000 and less—much less for higher mileage cars.

​1973-’79 Audi Fox

What to Pay: $875-$4,500

Today’s “B9”-chassis Audi A4 can directly trace its lineage back to the early-1970s B1 Audi 80, sold here as the Fox in handsome Giorgetto Giugiaro-styled two- and four-door notchback sedan, plus wagon forms. A popular car in its day—more than 100,000 were imported!—the efficiently packaged front-drive Fox was hugely important for its parent company, spawning VW’s equivalent Dasher/Passat and sharing engineering and small-displacement SOHC four-cylinder engines with the A1 Golf/Rabbit and Scirocco. If you can find a 1978-’79 Fox GTI, you’ll have the sport sedan that introduced us to those three famous letters. Sadly, like the 100LS, few Foxes remain roadworthy today, and those holdouts trade hands for a pittance considering their historical significance. According to classic.com, just three Foxes have sold at auction since 2016: the outlier, an enthusiast-modified ’76 wagon used in a 2019 Audi commercial, brought nearly $14,000 in 2020.

1982-’86 Bitter SC

What to Pay: $15,000-$32,000

The art of coachbuilding limited-series-production cars with seven-figure price tags is the purview of ultra-luxury automakers today, but 40 years ago, there was a stylish, Opel Senator-based luxury-sports coupe that was within reach of well-heeled, but not necessarily filthy-rich, buyers. Today that car—the SC by Bitter—is genuinely affordable in comparison to the average new vehicle, and it offers real exclusivity. With 461 examples built over five model years and a fraction of those remaining roadworthy in America, you won’t fi nd a Bitter at every cars-and-coffee gathering. The SC has the benefit of using a largely standard Opel straight-six engine linked to a General Motors automatic or Getrag manual transmission, as well as an active international club, and some U.S.-based specialists. If you’re considering a Mercedes-Benz SEC or BMW 635 but prefer to spend less and stand out, consider taking the alternate route with a sweet Bitter.

​1970-’73 BMW R75/5

What to Pay: $6,000-$18,000

In 1969, Honda unveiled the four-cylinder CB750—a revolutionary machine that created the superbike segment. You know the names: Triumph Trident, BSA Rocket 3, Norton Commando, Kawasaki H2 Mach IV, etc. But the BMW R75/5… a 750 super bike? Well, in the words of Cycle World’s editors, circa-1970: “Kind of.” No one ever nicknamed a BMW “the widow maker,” but the R75/5 was more exciting than BMWs of yore. The iconic opposed twin engine remained, but it was lighter and more powerful with new alloy barrels, redesigned heads, and more. Telescoping forks replaced the Earle’s leading link front end and the frame was lighter, yet very rigid. The overbuilt BMW stuff was there too: an automotive-type dry clutch, a 200-watt alternator, an automotive-type starter motor, and shaft drive. Today, original superbikes are hot collectibles and prices often reflect it. With a little searching, well-maintained and reasonably priced R75/5 airheads (as well as their 500 cc /50 and 600 cc /60 stablemates) can be found. Additionally, they’re bikes you could still ride daily, thanks to their bulletproof design, ease of maintenance, and abundant parts supply. You can even rely on BMW dealer support.

1965-’67 Mercedes-Benz 200/230

What to Pay: $3,650-$12,000

Proving that even the vaunted engineers at Mercedes-Benz were subject to the whims of fashion is the existence of the heckflosse, or “fintail” cars of the late 1950s through mid-1960s. While the pointy backsides of these midsize sedans soon dated their styling, the engineering under that skin was state-of-the-art, with heavy focuses on occupant comfort, safety, and build quality. The 200 models, using gas or diesel four-cylinder engines, and the six-cylinder 230, offered an athletic European driving experience compared to the isolating, floaty ride of contemporary Cadillacs and Lincolns. Nearly one million fintail Benzes would be built over nine years, and they’ve long represented an inexpensive way to enjoy classic-Mercedes ownership. That the pages of HMN contain numerous well-regarded parts and restoration specialists— including the factory-sponsored Mercedes-Benz Classic Center!— to keep them on the road makes them virtually timeless.